The Choice: The 3rd Amendment
Its overarching principles are not as antiquated as they seem.
Issue #883 The Choice, Friday, July 4, 2025
Every Friday until the end of 2025, we will publish a post about each of the 27 Amendments to the Constitution.
The 3rd Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights ratified in 1791, states: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." This amendment addresses a grievance about British troops being forcibly housed in colonists' homes, which was both immediate and tangible in the 18th century.
In the current political climate where the Adminstration is attempting to set up a white supremacist and fascist state in America, the literal circumstances of the 3rd Amendment are unlikely to affect the average American household. Yet, the amendment’s primary premise—a guard against government intrusion into the private lives of citizens—speaks to the prevailing and broader issues at play.
As technology evolves, so does the potential for privacy compromise. Specifically due to “DOGE” and “Project 2025,” discussions around data security, surveillance, and the role of government in regulating and accessing personal information have become increasingly urgent. While the 3rd Amendment specifically protects against the physical quartering of soldiers, it also champions the sanctity of personal space and autonomy.
The 3rd Amendment's implicit endorsement of personal sanctuary remains relevant in debates over data encryption, facial recognition technologies, and the extent of governmental access to digital communications.
Moreover, the amendment's principles resonate beyond privacy. They touch on broader themes of consent and choice—a citizen's right to determine what happens within their own domain. This notion extends to various aspects of 21st-century life, from the sanctity of one’s home to decisions about data sharing with corporations and governments.
Today, the 3rd Amendment, though seemingly antiquated, underscores the need for vigilance in preserving our liberties, both tangible and intangible. It calls upon us to consider the implications of illegally expanded governmental powers and our role as protectors of our own freedom.
If you like us, REALLY like us, please click the little heart “Like” button at the top of this post!
Buttons:
Heart: Like Bubble: Comment Arrow Up: Share Arrows Circle: Restack
If you like us, REALLY like us, please click the “Like” button at the top of this post!
Your “Likes” mean a LOT to us! We appreciate your support!
Buy Pam a cup of Colombian Coffee!
Engage with us and our posts on Substack Notes, where we publish new content almost daily.
Our July 2025 subscriber goals are 400 new free subscribers and 80 new paid subscribers! You can help us reach our goal!
We Are Speaking is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Follow Pam on Bluesky, the best “X” alternative.
Follow Keith on Bluesky, the best “X alternative.
Independent Authors and Creative Professionals: Check out my valuable books and courses on Branding and Marketing just for you via Pam Speaks 2 You.
